Comments on: Was Cash 4 Clunkers the Ultimate Rebill?

By: Tran Harry

Tran Harry — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:53:34 +0000

Very good way to look at it from an Affiliate point of view.

By: List Building Blog

List Building Blog — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:26:53 +0000

I am just hoping that the consumer is happy not just for now. I am sure they wanted to be having a better standing.
If the monthly payment is too high, then how could they afford it.

By: Captain Crunch

Captain Crunch — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:35:43 +0000

Did MSNBC promote Bush protests?
http://mediamatters.org/reports/200904080025

The first big bailout was from Bush. He would have had more in 2009 if he was still President. McCain supported the first bailout, while the tea party people sat at home and complained about Nancy Pelosi’s hairdo.

For lots of Obama’s plans, the Republicans have proposed alternatives that were still many billions of dollars. President McCain would be throwing around mega dollars to help the economy.

If political parties and special interests didn’t exist, maybe a bunch of top economists would be brought together and come up with some type of compromise. Instead it turns into “my team vs. the bad guys” ANGER FEST.

By: newjersey

newjersey — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:20:13 +0000

Bush was a big spender, but nothing compared to what Obama has done to this country. It is not even in the same ball park.

Bush spending was out of control, but Obama spending is destroying the country.

Dismiss protesters if you want – you sound just like MSNBC and other liberal media outlets. Tea party protesters include democrats, republicans and independents.

By: Captain Crunch

Captain Crunch — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 05:07:40 +0000

Where were these tea parties when Bush was shattering all spending records?

Where were the protests when this year Obama asked for $90 billion more, to go along with the already huge military budget.

$3 billion for cash for clunkers upsets people?

Obama could spend $900 billion to blow up and rebuild car factories and hospitals overseas and many of these tea party people wouldn’t care. But oh no, try and spend a few billion to actually help people in the USA and now we’re going to hell.

Yeah, Ron Paul and some others have stood up against outrageous war spending, but most of these tea party people are just angry that a Democrat is in office.

By: newjersey

newjersey — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:58:38 +0000

the taxpayer really got the shit end of the stick here.

wealth redistribution is a BAD thing. The government should stay the fuck out of private business.

i’m going to DC on 9/12 for the tea party this country is going to hell very fast.

By: Chris Peterson

Chris Peterson — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:32:15 +0000

Smart strategy, which appears to benefit everyone concerned in the picture. But consumer anyway would be the paying & suffering member according to me.

By: Reverse Cell Phone Lookup

Reverse Cell Phone Lookup — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:11:05 +0000

Trading in a paid-off car for a monthly bill of $399 could have been the worst financial decision for many buyers.

By: rawbones

rawbones — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:52:37 +0000

And the 4500.00 is taxable income, furthermore the dealers get most of the 4500.00 not the sheeple. It was a massive scam to direct taxpayer money to the dying dealers and volume starved automakers without the sheeple complaining.

The best part is the sheeple get to pay taxes on money they really never got.

Makes Acai rebills look pristine

you go niggah

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:25:25 +0000

Amen brother. It’s like hey “I’ll give you $4500 for that piece of junk but you can pay me $15,000 for taking it off your hands”. I kind of wonder if the this is one of those times where the government is saying “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”