Comments on: A Big Prosper202 Fix

By: Ad Dominator

Ad Dominator — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:49:23 +0000

Hi Wes, Could you guys put out a new Prosper 1.33 version
with the new table types plus some other goodies,
so we don’t have to make the change on every install ?

By: Ben

Ben — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:17:19 +0000

@ken you have to run a pretty sizeable amount of traffic to 202. if you’re running 5-20k clicks a day you probably want to do this and think about running it on a dedicated server with memcached.

By: LukePeerFly

LukePeerFly — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:36:09 +0000

Thanks for the heads up! I’ve had a few pubs with this issue. I’ll let them know

By: Ken Savage

Ken Savage — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:04:10 +0000

How much traffic do you have to run through P202 for this to be an issue?

By: Wass

Wass — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:04:14 +0000

Awesome. Thanks for the heads up!

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:20:36 +0000

Sweet deal! I love it. This fix will make my life a bit easier… now if only I could figure out how to track across multiple pages correctly.